
I believe Pi comes to completion because I have an idea of perfection in my head and namely a perfect circle. The former is a leap of faith and the latter is something a priori which I think the Rationalist would say that Pi would ultimately be deduced from this axiomatic idea. For example and I would credit this to Rene Descartes that I can think of a perfect disc but I cannot prove its circumference to certainty.
In my opinion I think it’s possible to know it by certain because there has to be a “line” that I would have to cross or I cannot make circular objects work or to a greater degree experience.
I would build a supercomputer to observe this phenomenon but I really think the mathematical notations we have today or are in practice are limited not only because I have not exhausted them and perhaps using them, pi would be endless.
But I would suggest a new kind of notation and something in the realm of dot-notation to make the leap and complete that link. I think this is possible because I can think of a complete circle, I can draw a “perfect” circle and Jobs created a circle too (apple building). Therefore If I can have it in mind from where it is created to practicality so I can’t I do it in terms of math or simple math (because as far as I know there have been no new additions to methods in mathematical logic as taught in lower division college). At least I am taught to think, “…that’s PI as we know it.” Maybe PI is so fine that only a computer break the code but that only people can master it.
I want to measure with a tool to calculate a circumference of a disk to a degree of one hundred percent certain and it is only then when we will fly!

