Higher Power; a higher authority. This is a power subjective to the individual that is much greater than themselves. This concept could encompass every faith in the human race from the beginning of time. It could also mean that a person reaches within himself and make the necessary leap or a chain of leaps in order to find this place that in turn could bring harmony within oneself in respect to the outer world around him and definitely respective and in direct relation to him. Therefore Higher Power can take on many forms either by inward reflection or perceiving the finer things of perfection outside of him. I say finer because higher power is better than him and has to be if he is to be guided by this kind of belief or belief system in terms of next steps or actions; a deliberate dialogue between himself and a higher perception in us that corrects us from our faults. Higher Power is better than the ego because it is here where we somehow use a certain force and I don’t know where it really comes from, maybe the universal laws of truth. It’s the search for something that is not complete in us but always will be flawed because we are inherently awed by the fragilities of our minds and the world outside of it. Either way the optimistic notion is to use this force to go forward in thinking and thereby discovering more and more of the nature of higher power as we become enlightened ourselves with new ideas and revelations.For me higher power is ultimately Christ. Also from day to day living it could mean new information that I discover for myself whether from the public or any other kind of reading that leads to truth that I may have previously not known in order to make the next day more fulfilling. Also Higher Power could reflect a sense of source and for me this is in thought and the phenomenon of the outside world. But I find that after inward thinking that I might seem to perceive some evidence in my environment to substantiate my thinking and that’s the force that corrects me. I see higher power as a entity or a combination of two realities both a priori and a posteriori that manifests itself like a substance in propulsion that compels me to better my self and thus brings be closer to this source than previous position or what I have previously know whether in some ways filling gaps to premises in a argument of some sort that leads to better defined conclusions or that I can come to conclude right away with new axioms or self-evident fundamentals of truths that epiphanize my connected ideas in me.
Immovable Mover; the first object. Here whatever god is it is the first thing and you can’t find anything more fundamental to the universe. It is the first cause for which everything else follows and that could repeat in a fashion that is circular in nature. Therefore the whole universe could start finish and start over again and when it starts over again with the same materials as in the first it might have a different flavor in the second round, third round, and so on and so forth.
First Cause; first mover. This is being as a self-evident truth (the starter). But what can come before a first is a nothing at all whatever that may be like a void with no color no black no white and nothing in between at all not even space. Is a single concept of what comes before possible? Well we have the zero and negative numbers in math but do we really know what it is that they represent in our minds. Can the zero cause be something we cannot conceptualize? This is where I think the a priori concept of god comes in as something also perfect and thereby by definition it can’t be improved. It’s axiomatic by the very nature of the mind because it’s structure cannot exceed this and I don’t know what the mind of god is.
A priori concept of Perfection ; axiomatic conception. What I mean by axiomatic is that god is automatic. You can’t get rid of it as much as you want to at certain times. We are are automatic beings but what put us in motion? And we come in the image of this before-ness of that self-evident truth and that may be something like a universe of chaos a cosmos with no laws. But even this cosmos might have a “random” system like a computer produces random numbers given a seed from the time clock and in motion by the vibration of its crystal. And for now I can’t imagine any other external system that would be an initial cause to where we are today or how we experience reality in our world here on Earth or in our galaxy. The empiricist would definitely deny my claims to this higher being that I have in my mind because I would have to provide proof and empirical facts or get him to experience what I know but that cannot happen as everything I say is subjective to him. But then when I approach others in light of this rhetoric or line of reasoning how is it that some say or affirm that they understand? How is it that they relate to me regardless of the power of their intellection? I think all cultures around the globe of a kind of higher being in mind and within their own framework of cultivation that they can relate to. But then their is still doubt which the empiricist argues for and I would agree. I don’t what to say that you have to make the leap of faith because then time after time the continuance of this creates even more doubt in me. but what I am trying to do is to see this higher being and tie it to our ever expanding library of knowledge. For arguments sake if were to agree that there were a higher being for this cosmos wouldn’t you say that one characteristic of him or her would that he would be all-knowing. Therefore, when I pursue knowledge in academia I feel like I am getting closer and closer to real truth that in almost all situations cannot be doubted unless there is a paradigm shift that ultimately tells me that my pursuit of truth has either changed, keep some dump some, or that there are more paths ahead. Even for my self I still need empirical proof and I don’t know if that’s a blasphemy or sin because if you can’t make that final leap of faith at the point of perish and make that leap of faith then who can you really trust?
Halo in Reverse; the impossibility of such; Dpch Md = Fst Fshn: satan.
Subtratum [Roger, look this up]. Subtstratum reversed is the universe without laws or chaos. The Substratum is the ingredient that keeps everything together in the universe. So sort of it’s like an invisible glue that’s there but you can’t see it. But the propagators tell us that it does exist (CSUN-Yagisawa). Russell posed the question to the effect of ‘how do we know if the sun is going to come up tomorrrow?’ I would say that the sun will be there for us as long as the energy that caused it and the connection to the effect dies out and I don’t have a time-frame for it. To me the substratum doesn’t exist as long as it can’t be measured in scientific terms. By acknowledging the substratum means you know something; an idea or whatever it is. Is it some kind of truth? then it can be deduced from reason. Is it some kind of force? Is it beyond human understanding? I think not. Then how can we talk about it. I just think it’s a weak answer to Russell’s question. To me the substratum is Time in terms of any Earthly thinker or the higher being that’s always in question. To be this Time can be a force that bends like Einstein’s space. Man has time. The universe has time in the sense that what if time in any kind of moment runs out, doesn’t that thing transform in the line of reasoning that nothing can be created and nothing can be destroyed. Therefore the substratum has velocity in terms of time that can bend meaning that the sun could go out at any moment. But, if it could be measured and manipulated then we would escalate human know-how to another level. What I want to know is where does energy in its totality in the universe come from and can it be lost? Where does time come from and can it be bent to bring about a force which they can call the substratum. I think I can safely say that stars are born and then they die and that takes time because of time in terms of physics where the material of which the sun is made up of becomes dead.
Intelligent Design. What is intelligent design as the “higher power” of the universe or the multiverse? It is something to the effect or degree of what we know of in ourselves namely the human mind or to lesser degrees the minds of animals on planet Earth. It could be a machine yet and thus compute power with artificial intelligence so to speak and definitely self-aware.
Computer Machine; the Matrix or so on…god could be a machine in that vibrating crystal such as a computer but I don’t know where the energy for that same kind of vibration comes from.
The Sun; The Systems of Sons; Ra; Egypt
Energy; E=MC^II; all work
Mind; consciousness
Infinitetessmal Universe; ever-expanding extraneous space
The Void Space
Illuminosity In Space
Dimensional Space
The Unbelievable and Unbreakable
The Human Soul or Spirit – does it really exist?
A system of gods and goddesses. We have different races here on earth all capable of accomplishing virtually the same thing or objectives; so, why can’t we imagine a world of divinity where these beings congregate and concede to simple truths and then adjourn to produce their own work? I say this because I’m different both aesthetically, body, and and mind and everyone here believes that they are created in the image of god (but I don’t know what the aetheist’s position would be?) Therefore and strictly and only in my opinion, it is to my estimation that the divine world has its figure for the sole purpose of my kind. Everyone is unique no doubt even identical twins but we all have certain commonalities and that’s why we call ourselves humans, gods as gods and to say the least we leave animals to the world of the animal kingdom. I agree that we are animals yet and definitely started out as such back then but not now. Today we can penetrate the limits of our environment to other places where animals (not human) cannot do.
My reflectivity will be inevitably influenced by the New Testament and the Old in relationship to the new will be influenced by by Master Ron Pohnel]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]<<<<(roger, add this but I did take Religions of the World at University.))))]]]]]]]]]]]]]
Jesus Christ is a gateway to God for the final destination and for ultimate judgement upon us all. You see we are all inside a computer based machine that works like binary digits or bits. When you die you will ascend into a new realm where you will see his light, power and glory and Christ is going to personally say to each either “pass” or “no pass”. Now this works much like a simple logic gate and you can see how it resembles machine language. You see at the time of his cruxifiction him and his two brothers contemplated in atrocious blood as to what will be done at that time. If Jesus says no then you take the express elevater to hell and befriend Satan. If Jesus says yes please move on then you move on to God himself and you better know your bits, mind you. This is needless to say but must be stated for rhetorical purposes that all things being equal, if you can know the binary digit system then you have the damning potential of understanding machine language. And it is then that you are welcomed into his World and come to realize yourself as your true self that you are created in the image of God. And then when you know the Kokozyon dot notation which is at a very fundamental level either a open circle (or dot) or closed circle (or dot) that you can take on any shape or form and know that you are in His image because this is a universally understood graphical system of representation. And if you really make it that far “up” and are smart about it the next logical question in this verbal but more on a personal level would be to ask this God is “why?” and he would have two and only two possible logical responses either: “why not” (the negation) or “I don’t know”. The three factors here resemble a tertiary system which is consistent with my notation and yet a prime number which is significant to its own set of values.
[[[Include the ‘parity bit’ as ‘judement’or make the parity bit gods decision or something like and apply to Jesus somehow see if this idea works. The system is still tertiary[Something like this]