Hybrid school or not?

If all laws are a process of discovery that we go through in order to understand them then all my ideas are from experience. But how do we come to understand them. Is it that since experience is rated first among these people that the rational never comes first . I could say that it takes thinking to discover these ideas. And the other side could say that you would have to use one of your five senses or a combination of two in order to grasp the idea in the first place before you do any thinking at all. And therefore I could not be a Rationalist. So my idea of perfection comes from experience even though I cannot experience perfection in its essence with the five senses.}}} One day I’m an empiricist and another a rationalist like a roller coaster ride at Magic Mountain. I am born with rationale and have all the forms and concepts in me before I open my eyes to the light and then experience kicks in. But to me it seems like both are important to the understanding of the things around us and that’s why I like to think of myself as someone who likes to think it as a hybrid school of thought. For those of you who think you are born with all the laws of the universe then you are a Rationalist. And there are some of you that adhere to the other school where experience accounts for all. if i was forced to choose i would have to tilt to my rationale as responsible for everything. it exists in my mind first, axiomatically.