[post under heavy reconstruction]
I want to talk about memory in us and memory in nature. According to animals of the world our memories about our experiences are imperfect because the physiology of beings are volatile but not space time. The memory of us in respect to space time is perfect. Let’s talk about memory from a philosophical viewpoint.
Re-experiencing your memory that has the essence of time and situation paralleled and differentiated is common to all of us. When your memory experience is paralleled in two time periods then it is sort of like having a deja vouz and when it is the latter then it is the same but a different memory because of its sensory depletion in the mind.
So according to Hubbard you re-experience your memory from the study of his Scientologist viewpoint and I want to know if that memory has depleted? All I know is that when I wake up from a clear, vivid, and “real” dream my memory of it depletes. All memory depletes. You cannot go back to the initial state in your psyche no matter how intense the experience or how professional the manner of retrieving that memory.
My measure here is the memory immediately after the experience and especially when the reality settles down and over time. Now time and not even a long time can cure the memory but time does sometimes erode the memory if that memory is not important or ingrained in us for reasons here unknown. The synaptic responses are different if you want to put it in full biological scientific mannerisms.
We all know that the more intense our experience of some thing then the more of it will be proportionally intense and it comes with some erosion or forgetfulness. When we have a shocking experience the synaptic connections in our brains are at their greatest and I don’t want to get into this or that part of the brain or that we don’t use our fullest potential like so widely believed. We do use our brains full potential all the time but it’s that some people have more brain power because they have gone through a developmental process whereas others have to take baby steps in that same process in order to achieve a higher brain power in an intellectual state and no other state is what I’m talking about.
Hubbard and I would agree that there is plenty of memory in us ad infinitude and at varying degrees but I want to say that you cannot recognize anything unless you had some sort of memory. Otherwise you would just be a living thing – dead. But, come again? Everything has memory whether alive or not or else it could not react. Do you notice that everything around you is reacting to other things in the scheme and when that sun hits the flag pole and a shadow is cast the shadow is a point of record in space-time that is like an illusion that had been forgone until up to this point or that someone has beaten me to it. For which I don’t care; I know this phenomenon and it satisfies me.
Some things react to the laws of nature and everything reacts to the laws of nature. Memory is inherent as a great quality in the very fabric of existence itself and it is perfect. Why is it that humans record everything especially in this onset of a technological age? Where did this concept of writing things down for future use come from? Well, we discovered it from mother nature. Therefore the whole universe is just one large data bank that is very Einsteinian in its dynamic. The memory of you is recorded in curves because your body taking up space pushes against the Einsteinian fabric and not to mention Newton and everyone else that came before. (And it’s going to happen with everyone that comes after these intellectuals or geniuses.)
A solid example of how “memory” was discovered in nature is when pre-historic fish have been pushed down on rock that no longer exist as organisms today. Can we just reject that nature doesn’t do that to us in some way or another? What if we make an impression each and every one of us in the fabric of space-time?
It is of my opinion and I am by far not the first one that we are being recorded in time. Every move that you make is being impressed upon super space time. And what I mean by super is that you cannot see it with the naked eye. We have to tap into it with machines in order to experiment with such a reality or phenomenon and I don’t know if it would be good or bad. But I guess you could be either kind or malicious with it.
This is where parallel universes can exist and can seem very possible and real if we had the science to tap into such a reality. Imagine gravity taking shape around us everywhere we go and that shape reverberates as energy into another space somewhere else, so there would be two or even infinitely many of you ready to be viewed or experienced both forward and backward in time.
What I want to do is tap into the record keeping quality of nature. And when I say viewed I mean that you cannot exist in one space-time period and at the same time be present in the midst of you in another space-time period. Because you cannot be identically in two spaces at once. One of you is going to have to be you the other younger or the other older. The universes are parallel but there is a little bit of a time shift because of how Einstein describes the cosmos.
When memory is depleted in time it’s you but you don’t know what you is going to behave like?
Kokozyon True Fiction 